At 12 months, Rosie users showed no significant anxiety or depression advantage over a monthly children's book program.

Access to Rosie, an AI chatbot for maternal health, showed no statistically significant anxiety or depression benefit at 12 months compared with a monthly children's book program in a 400-person randomized trial.

The study, published Nov. 4 in JAMA Network Open, tested access to health advice among pregnant and postpartum participants with generally low starting symptom scores.

Rosie was designed to answer maternal and infant health questions, offer personalized guidance, and provide reminders and educational support. A clinical social worker reviewed distress alerts, contacted participants, and provided resources, so the intervention included human support alongside the chatbot.

Researchers assigned 200 participants to each group. The US study enrolled English-speaking people aged 14 or older who were pregnant or parenting an infant younger than six months and identified as members of racial or ethnic minoritized groups.

Enrollment ran from October 2023 through December 2024, with follow-up completed in December 2025.

The primary measures were self-reported anxiety symptoms on the GAD-7 questionnaire and depression symptoms on the PHQ-9 questionnaire. The 12-month analyses included 361 participants for anxiety and 362 for depression.

The adjusted difference between the chatbot and control groups was 0.10 points for anxiety, with a 95% confidence interval of -0.77 to 0.96. For depression, it was -0.23 points, with an interval of -1.05 to 0.59.

Both intervals include zero, leaving uncertainty about the size and direction of any underlying effect. The trial established neither a clear benefit nor equivalence between the approaches.

Source link