CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

OpenAI Touts Cyber Workflow Worth $1.2 Million in Tokens for a Single Run

Gizmodo - Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
OpenAI Touts Cyber Workflow Worth $1.2 Million in Tokens for a Single Run

Imagine initiating an AI system one time, and then getting billed $1,213,430 when the run finishes. No really, OpenAI wants you to imagine it.

The company has published an intriguing blog post about “an autonomous vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and patching pipeline” that spawns countless agents that hunt down a massive number of software vulnerabilities, prove they’re scary, and create the code that would eliminate them. It sounds a little like a giant, multi-armed, automated colonoscopy for a highly complex codebase, not just poking around for dangerous polyps, but also essentially eliminating them.

OpenAI says this particular system, designed to scan the Linux kernel—which is the bedrock on which Android phones and much of the internet are built— found 2,308 potential vulnerabilities. After some further paring down, it then sorted out the worst of these potential problems, running them on a virtual machine to prove they can be used to fully take control of a system. In 948 cases, OpenAI says the vulnerabilities were proven to be truly dangerous.

Patch-writing agents then wrote the 948 necessary patches, but didn’t actually edit the codebase. The patches were sent for approval from humans first.

For the AI tokens consumed in all the “thinking” that goes into one single, solitary run of this giant AI workflow, OpenAI says if the client were to be billed, the API cost would be $1,213,430.

We’re meant to think of it this way: By OpenAI’s math, $1,213,430 in tokens comes out to $1,279 per validated exploit. This kind of work is usually done by paying white-hat hackers $20,000 to $70,000 in bug bounties.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.