CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

Google Tries to Walk Back Controversial School AI Policy Following Political Backlash

Gizmodo - Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Google Tries to Walk Back Controversial School AI Policy Following Political Backlash

On Tuesday, the internet and politicians responded in outrage to a New York Times report saying that Google would effectively ban students from accessing Search if their schools banned AI entirely under a new initiative.

“Search and AI are deeply integrated,” Google’s vice president for education Chris Phillips told the New York Times, reportedly adding that if a school banned access to its AI services, students “will not have access to search, and they’ll see a message from their school that indicates it’s not available.”

The report immediately drew ire. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who recently announced a ban on student-facing generative AI through eighth grade, said that Google was “trying to use its monopoly power to force AI into our public schools.”

“No corporation should have the power to dictate how we teach our children,” Mamdani wrote in an X post. “Our public schools exist to serve students, not to grow the profit margins of Big Tech.”

Now, Google is claiming that it was all a misunderstanding, while stopping short of directly addressing the central concern raised by the New York Times report: that schools can’t offer students access to Search without also giving them access to AI features.

“We want to clarify what we announced today about our education services,” Google said in a post on X. “Today’s announcements give schools more choice, not less.”

Under the new initiative , expected to take effect early next year, Google’s Gemini, Gemini Notebook, and Search will be off by default for K-12 student accounts.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.