CONNECT WITH US
HealthTech

HealthTech

Personal locator beacons save lives. But they can't make hiking safe

Medical Xpress logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Personal locator beacons save lives. But they can't make hiking safe

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

Hiking in Australia is having a moment. In the decade ending in 2024, hiking popularity rose 81%.

Social media reels of remote, beautiful landscapes make these places feel more accessible. But there's a risk that the increased visibility of remote places can draw newer hikers to overly challenging routes.

Many are getting into trouble. Rescues from Western Australia's highest peak, Bluff Knoll, increased fourfold in a year, while Queensland's Glass House Mountains have seen a surge in rescues. A similar trend in England and Wales has been linked to reliance on unsuitable navigation apps and popular social media locations.

Inevitably, this has led to tragedies. In Australia, a tourist died of hypothermia at Tasmania's Cradle Mountain, as did two university students near Victoria's Mount Bogong.

After the tragic death of 18-year-old hiker Lily Hooper on a remote trail in New South Wales this year, her grieving family called for the creation of "Lily's Law" to avoid future tragedies. It would aim to improve awareness of personal locator beacons and other emergency communication and tracking technologies.

Earlier this year, the grieving family of a prospector who died in remote Western Australia called for mandatory beacon use in other remote settings.

These tragedies raise a broader question: Should hikers be required to carry a personal locator beacon or other emergency communication device on remote or high-risk routes?


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.