CONNECT WITH US
HealthTech

HealthTech

Health System Leaders Say AI Governance Must Continue Long After Approval

HealthSystemCIO logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Health System Leaders Say AI Governance Must Continue Long After Approval

Hartford HealthCare’s technology and clinical AI leaders and Vitea’s CEO explain how health systems keep watch over AI after approving it. Watch below or on YouTube.

Approving an AI tool does not settle whether it will stay safe, panelists said during a recent healthsystemCIO Webinar. The tool can behave differently a month later, and vendors also keep adding AI to software health systems already own. Joel Vengco, SVP and Chief Information & Digital Officer at Hartford HealthCare, joined Barry Stein, MD, SVP, Chief Clinical Innovation Officer & CMIO at Hartford HealthCare, and Shantanu Nigam, co-founder and CEO of Vitea, which sponsored the event. They described the oversight that has to follow approval. It starts with checking the application inventory against what is actually running. It also covers contract terms requiring notice of AI changes and monitoring independent of the vendor’s word.

Until about four years ago, most applications were deterministic, Nigam said, behaving the same way each time. Generative AI is less predictable. Some applications can now write queries on the fly that reach data tables they were never meant to touch. As a result, behavior observed at approval says little about behavior six months later.

“The riskiest AI is probably not even what you’re looking out for in the market,” Nigam said. “It might be an app you approved two years ago that just got an upgrade, and now it’s got an LLM behind it doing something.”

As a physician, Stein compared deployed agents to new doctors joining the medical staff.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.