CONNECT WITH US
Apple

Apple

Following $5.7B verdict, Taction wants a cut of iPhone and Apple Watch sales through 2035

9to5Mac logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Following $5.7B verdict, Taction wants a cut of iPhone and Apple Watch sales through 2035

Following a historic $5.7 billion patent infringement verdict against Apple, Taction Technology is now seeking additional damages, interest, and ongoing royalties on future iPhone and Apple Watch sales. Here are the details.

Late last month, a US jury found that Apple’s Taptic Engine infringed on two patents held by Taction Technology, awarding $5.7 billion in damages. Apple strongly disputed the verdict, arguing that its technology was fundamentally different from Taction’s, and said it would appeal.

A few weeks later, Apple asked the court to overturn the verdict or order a new trial, arguing that Taction had failed to provide evidence supporting the $5.7 billion award, leaving jurors to engage in “impermissible guesswork on a massive scale.”

Now, as spotted by Reuters, Taction has filed a motion seeking supplemental damages, ongoing royalties on future iPhone and Apple Watch sales, prejudgment interest dating back to April 2021, and additional interest from the date of the final judgment until Apple pays.

According to Taction, the jury’s award only accounted for Apple’s sales through March 2026, leaving another six months of iPhone and Apple Watch sales for which the company is now seeking compensation.

Interestingly, Taction is using Apple’s own arguments from its previous patent litigation against Samsung to support its request for ongoing royalties.

In that case, Apple argued that royalties should apply not only to products found to infringe its patents, but also to newer models using essentially the same technology.

Taction is now making the same argument, seeking to extend royalty payments to Apple’s latest devices, including the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, Apple Watch Series 12, and Apple Watch Ultra 4, which it says “are not more than colorably different from the infringing products.”


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.