CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

New Technique Bypasses 1,024-Bit RSA Without Factoring It

Gizmodo - Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
New Technique Bypasses 1,024-Bit RSA Without Factoring It

The RSA encryption algorithm may be even more endangered now, courtesy of University of California, San Diego and Inria Nancy researchers.

Cyber Security News reported that a new signature forgery attack detailed in the researchers’ paper deployed a novel method to crack 1,024-bit RSA encryption without factoring (finding the two primes used to create a key). The researchers were able to break encryption with an academic CPU cluster that dedicated 1,380 CPU core-years to the problem over five months. Factoring a 1,024-bit RSA key, Cyber Security News noted, has previously been estimated to require 500,000 to 1 million CPU core-years.

RSA is not quantum-resistant, potentially meaning anything encrypted using it today could be broken by future attackers with access to a quantum computer. (The most obvious candidate is a nation-state.)

Ars Technica reported that the results bring even 2,048-bit and 4,096-bit keys to unacceptably low levels of security per standards published by the National Security Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the European Union’s main cybersecurity agency. The NIST already plans to deprecate RSA by 2030 and eliminate it by the middle of the next decade.

“If this result holds up under peer review, it would indeed be a conceptual break-through,” Allurity head of innovation and cryptographer Karsten Nohl told Ars Technica. “RSA is as difficult to break as it is to factor large integers, at least so we thought.”

The technique relies on a variant of the number field sieve algorithm which Cyber Security News noted was first proposed in 2007, but which researchers hadn’t run at this scale until now.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.