At first glance, it’s hard to see how Digger and The Social Reckoning could have much in common. One is a movie about an ambitious, egotistical man of wealth who delivers incalculable horrors that threaten to destroy humanity. And the other stars Tom Cruise.
But the one thing that really links these two movies is a question of stakes. At some point during each movie, I found myself asking, “Why do I care?” Watching Digger, I cared deeply by the end. So much so that I think it was my second-favorite movie of 2026 thus far. I’ve already seen it twice. During The Social Reckoning, the feeling of detached apathy never went away.
I should mention at this point that I’m going to reveal spoilers for both films, and if you haven’t seen Digger, I suggest you see the movie first. Digger is a lot more fun if you don’t know the twist.
Jeremy Strong gives a perfectly acceptable performance as Mark Zuckerberg. And it’s hard to fault the other actors in The Social Reckoning for a hokey script filled with laughable dialogue. But even if you can get over screenwriter Aaron Sorkin’s obnoxious lines, you’re still left with one big problem in The Social Reckoning : A movie set primarily in the late 2010s feels like ancient history when the technological threats to humanity are whether Meta’s Muse mistakenly empties my bank account and Anthropic’s Claude starts World War III. Or, at the very least, Claude is used to surveil Americans and power fully autonomous weapons .
Source link







