CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

Anthropic’s Says Its New AI Model Can Solve Black Hole Mysteries. What Could Go Wrong?

Gizmodo - Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Anthropic’s Says Its New AI Model Can Solve Black Hole Mysteries. What Could Go Wrong?

Anthropic announced Monday the release of two new versions of its AI models, Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2. The company claimed that the models are among its most capable ever, with improvements to coding, reasoning, and vision. Notably, the frontier lab claimed that its new models were able to solve two previously unsolved black hole physics problems, design working electronic devices, and produce a computer-verifiable version of the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem, among other breakthroughs.

Fable 5.2, which will become the company’s most powerful publicly available model, is the company’s highest-performing yet for “open-ended technical work.” It surpasses previous iterations of Anthropic’s models in several benchmarking tests for agentic capabilities, including coding tasks. It also outperforms competing frontier models on several of these evaluations, according to Anthropic’s testing.

Per Anthropic, while its latest iterations of its most powerful models have improved performance, they are also cheaper to run than previous versions. The company claims that outputs can be generated up to 30% faster than Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 were able to spit out, while cutting prices to $8 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens for both models—making them slightly cheaper than OpenAI’s most powerful model, GPT-6 Astra.

And while benchmarking and pricing are the universal metrics that models get compared across, the real thing companies love to do when a new model drops is tout just what they were able to get it to do. Anthropic has no shortage of examples of what it views as brag-worthy capabilities.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.