CONNECT WITH US
Gaming

Gaming

Marvel Officially Made the Saddest Death in MCU History More Tragic With Just 1 Sentence

Polygon logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Marvel Officially Made the Saddest Death in MCU History More Tragic With Just 1 Sentence

We get a totally new perspective on how it all went down

In Avengers: Infinity War, when Dr. Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) and a variety of other heroes are awaiting Thanos’ arrival on Titan, Strange uses the Time Stone to look into alternate futures to see the possible results of the impending conflict. Star Lord (Chris Pratt) asks Strange how many futures he looked into, and Strange replies, “14,000,605.” Then Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) asks how many of those resulted in their victory. Strange, looking deep into Stark’s eyes, says, “One.”

That one scenario involved Strange giving up the Time Stone to Thanos, letting him snap away half of existence, and, ultimately, Iron Man sacrificing himself at the end of Avengers: Endgame to defeat Thanos’ army. And while Tony Stark’s AI inside the Iron Man suit, F.R.I.D.A.Y., was present for all of this, that didn’t stop her from double-checking Dr. Strange’s math.

In the second episode of VisionQuest, Vision (Paul Bettany) was badly injured by the adamantium bullets Paladin (Todd Stashwick) shot him with. J.A.R.V.I.S. (James D’Arcy) sacrificed himself to save Vision by deleting his code, reverting the power to run him back to Vision’s system, but in episode 3, it's clear Vision still needs further repairs. The remaining AIs housed in Vision’s mind scramble to help, with F.R.I.D.A.Y. (Orla Brady) taking the lead and E.D.I.T.H. (Emily Hampshire) doing what she can to assist.

Y. S. was always better at writing code than she was. Y. S. H.



Source link
Related Topics:Gaming

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.