CONNECT WITH US
Gaming

Gaming

Making games now vs then: Nordic veterans on 25 years of changing practices

PocketGamer.biz logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Making games now vs then: Nordic veterans on 25 years of changing practices

At Pocket Gamer Connects Nordics in Helsinki on October 20th to 21st, the panel “Making Games Then & Now: 25 Years Of Changing Practices” will revisit the turning points that shaped game development from the 2000s to the 2020s. Some are global, some distinctly Nordic, and others are deeply personal.

Ahead of the event, we asked some of our panellists what has changed most since they started out, which old instincts still hold and what the next era of development might bring.

For Jaakko Kemppainen, a lecturer in the department of art and media at Aalto University, the biggest gap is education. “Back in early 2000s there were no schools for making games,” he says. There were a couple of game design books his team didn’t know about, plus programming manuals. Through cultural studies at university, he found the early game theorists: Huizinga, Caillois and Suits.

“Things were much simpler, but we also lacked guidance and mentors,” he recalls. The upside was an open market. There were no digital storefronts yet, and mobile meant small Java games. “There was a lot of space for opportunistic experimentation.” His team made TV games that players controlled by texting from button phones, learning the casual market, technical limits and production pipelines on the fly.

” Some want to make personal, artistic games or recreate childhood favourites. Others are focused on monetisation trends. “There is a market for every game, but reaching the audience is the big question,” he says.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.