CONNECT WITH US
Fintech

Fintech

Three Regulators Give Banks Three Paths to Issue Stablecoins

PYMNTS – Fintech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Three Regulators Give Banks Three Paths to Issue Stablecoins

The Federal Reserve’s stablecoin proposals on Thursday (Sept. 24) put a third federal bank regulator’s plans on the table.

Banks can now see how the Fed, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. propose to supervise their digital dollars. The next decision is which banks can make a business of issuing them.

The proposals also bring stablecoins into the familiar bank strategy discussion of the choice of charter and regulator. A national bank issuing through a subsidiary would work principally with the OCC. An FDIC-supervised state bank would follow the FDIC’s process, while a Federal Reserve-supervised state member bank would use the Fed’s. All three agencies are implementing the GENIUS Act, but each is setting out its own approval and supervisory requirements.

Under the Fed’s proposal, supervised issuers would have to fully back their payment stablecoins with eligible assets, including short-term Treasury bills and other highly liquid holdings. The Fed also proposed capital and risk management standards and rules for firms safeguarding the reserves. A separate proposal would require banks seeking approval for an issuing subsidiary to submit a business plan and financial information. Both proposals remain open for comment.

The OCC proposed its framework in February. It covers reserves, redemption, custody, applications, reporting and supervision for issuers under its authority, including subsidiaries of national banks. In June, the agency also proposed weekly and quarterly reporting forms.

The FDIC’s April proposal addresses reserves, redemptions, capital, risk management and custody for issuers it supervises.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.