Thai activist groups staged protests in Bangkok against Chinese, Israeli and other foreign businesses accused of bypassing local ownership caps through nominee structures as quarterly growth slowed to 1.9 per cent in the second quarter.
The pushback targets foreign entities operating in protected commercial sectors without direct statutory permits, prompting authorities to consider widening an ongoing enforcement campaign against proxy shareholding arrangements.
Demonstrators gathered outside foreign diplomatic missions, including the Israeli embassy, in October 2026, citing widespread evasion of foreign business limits and labor regulations. Under current corporate rules, foreign ownership in designated services, retail and agricultural sectors remains capped unless granted specific board exemptions or bilateral treaty waivers. Activists argue that overseas operators increasingly rely on silent local shareholders to secure operating control while running competing storefronts and logistics networks.
Thai regulatory agencies have responded by reviewing business registrations in tourism hubs, retail districts and agricultural centers. Investigators examine voting rights, dividend distributions and bank accounts to identify enterprises where domestic shareholders act merely as legal fronts for overseas capital.
For international operators and regional suppliers, heightened scrutiny on corporate structures raises immediate compliance hurdles. Foreign retailers, distributors and franchise networks operating through joint ventures must prove authentic domestic capital participation or risk sudden operational halts and corporate deregistration. The risk sits directly with joint-venture operators that structured majority-local equity on paper while retaining sole operational and financial authority.
Local merchant groups continue to press trade authorities for tighter enforcement, arguing that foreign-backed entities flood consumer channels with subsidized imports and operate unlicensed supply chains.
Source link
