Charoen Pokphand Group (CP) issued a statement on Saturday distancing itself and senior chairman Dhanin Chearavanont from controversial patent registrations covering four new varieties of holy basil.

The agribusiness conglomerate responded after social media posts alleged CP and Mr Dhanin owned all holy basil varieties across Thailand, barring farmers and consumers from cultivating or selling the herb without permission.

“That is not factual, scares people and affects the reputation of Charoen Pokphand Group and the individual mentioned,” the company stated, noting that subsidiary CPRAM obtained the 4 plant patents independently.

CPRAM operates as a subsidiary of Stock Exchange of Thailand-listed CP All Plc. Charoen Pokphand Group holds equity in CP All, but the parent entity stated it maintains no operational authority over board decisions or intellectual property filings conducted by individual subsidiaries.

The dispute flared after social media claims alleged CP held a commercial monopoly over holy basil, known locally as kaphrao. Rumours claimed growers faced legal penalties without corporate licensing, prompting visible pushback from herb vendors across wholesale wet markets.

Contract farming and retail ready meal supply chains across Southeast Asia hinge on public goodwill, particularly when major conglomerates patent proprietary seeds for national staple ingredients. Operating companies in Thailand frequently develop crossbred crops to boost yields, uniform leaf sizes, and shelf life for high-volume chilled convenience meals, yet proprietary breeding quickly draws political scrutiny when perceived as corporate fencing of common culinary heritage.

For consumer operators, food processors, and supply chain managers, the controversy demonstrates that holding standard plant variety certificates can trigger immediate brand friction at retail stalls.

Source link