CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

The Biggest Benchmark in AI Just Updated, Dealing a Major Blow to a Chinese Contender

Gizmodo - Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
The Biggest Benchmark in AI Just Updated, Dealing a Major Blow to a Chinese Contender

Last week, Kimi K3.1 Pro, an LLM from the Beijing, China-based company Moonshot AI, debuted to a surprising amount of fanfare, particularly if you care about benchmarks, which are meant to be standardized measurements for models’ capabilities. It charted at a very respectable—in fact somewhat shocking—fourth place on the marquee Artificial Analysis benchmark called Intelligence Index v4. It also claimed the top spot on Artificial Analysis’ Terminal Bench 4.0, which is focused on computer use.

Kimi K3.1 Pro’s success was a minor earthquake in the AI world. The Decoder pointed out that if it had released its model weights publicly at its debut, it would have been the highest-scoring open weight model by a wide margin—not to mention the highest scoring Chinese model. “That would shrink the gap between open and proprietary models from 12 to just 3 points,” the Decoder wrote.

But that never technically happened, and then on Tuesday, Artificial Analysis announced a new version of its Intelligence Index called Intelligence Index v5. Artificial Analysis called it “our biggest upgrade since v4 launched in January.” 60% of the new test apparently involves private test questions, or “held-out answers,” according to Artificial Analysis. Both of these concepts point to Artificial Analysis seeking to curb “benchmaxxing,” the practice of preparing models for evaluations by feeding them old questions available online in repositories like Github and (famously) Hugging Face.

1 Pro’s ranking. It fell from its 4th place slot to 9th. ” Again, Moonshot still hasn’t released the model’s weights, and won’t until November 4 .


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.