CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

Schrödinger’s Election: AI Data Centers Were on the Ballot Even When They Weren’t

Gizmodo - Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Schrödinger’s Election: AI Data Centers Were on the Ballot Even When They Weren’t

The Democrats swept the Midterm elections on Tuesday night, but the Republicans weren’t the only ones dealt a blow. Americans went to the polls to voice their dismay over the unprecedented AI infrastructure buildout.

Even in places where they weren’t on the ballot through specific propositions, data centers became a central piece of candidate platforms and debates. So much so that several races across the country, particularly in areas ripe with data center development, became a referendum of sorts on the future of data centers and the AI industry.

There are many reasons why Americans are increasingly coming out against AI data centers. A portion of it has to do with backlash against the technology it is powering: AI-driven systems have been deemed semi-culprits in faulty military strikes, mass shootings, suicides, and surveillance. The CEOs of the AI labs building the technology have themselves promoted existential risks associated with AI development, spanning nightmare scenarios of mass unemployment and biological warfare.

But opposition to the massive physical infrastructure powering AI has grown even faster than broader public concern about the technology. Locals who share a neighborhood with AI data center projects have reported deafening noise pollution , rising utility bills, water shortages, concerns about harmful air pollution and associated health risks , and fears of tanking property values . A preliminary study has also linked data centers to higher land-surface temperatures in surrounding areas. Most planned data centers are located in rural areas, fueling concerns about the loss of agricultural land .


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.