CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

Most AI incident tools still leave a key decision to humans

TheNewStack – Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Most AI incident tools still leave a key decision to humans

An AI SRE agent can help troubleshoot an incident. But can you trust it to decide on its own when something needs attention?

In The New Stack‘s October 22 live webinar, Raaz Dwivedi, co-founder and CTO of Traversal and an assistant professor at Cornell Tech, will explore why most AI SRE tools still fall short of that level of autonomy — and what it takes to get there.

Drawing on his team’s work applying causal AI and agentic reasoning to production incidents, he’ll discuss the next steps toward self-healing software.

When we think about agent autonomy, we tend to see it as all-or-nothing: either an agent is autonomous or it isn’t. But for incident response, the reality is more like a three-phase progression.

The first phase is invoked: copilots, chat interfaces, and CLIs that wait for an on-call engineer to open them and ask a question mid-incident. The second is background: scheduled jobs, alert rules, and triggers that fire when conditions are predicted. Both phases depend on a human noticing that something is wrong and deciding to act.

The third phase marks an important shift: proactive agents decide for themselves when an incident needs attention, without waiting to be invoked or scheduled.

With many teams and tools stuck in one of the first two phases, Dwivedi will discuss where the shift to full autonomy is already happening, drawing on Traversal Workers already operating at the proactive end of the progression. He will also explore what changes engineering teams will need when the agent in their stack stops waiting to be asked.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.