CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

Amodei says Anthropic’s safety delay may have cost it an AI lead

TheNewStack – Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Amodei says Anthropic’s safety delay may have cost it an AI lead

Anthropic first released Mythos-class models in February 2026, but CEO Dario Amodei said it delayed broader access until June to build stronger cybersecurity safeguards.

Amodei laid out that reasoning Tuesday in a lengthy post on X, written in response to criticism from Nathan Calvin and defending the company’s approach to AI safety. He conceded the decision may have cost Anthropic a competitive edge. Releasing the models sooner, he argues, would have given organizations less time to prepare their infrastructure for increasingly capable AI-powered cyberattacks.

“We likely sacrificed a significant chunk of a several-month model lead,” Amodei writes.

Anthropic tells The New Stack that the delay follows a commitment in its Responsible Scaling Policy to require a strong argument that catastrophic risk is contained and to delay development and deployment as far as needed until it no longer believes it holds a significant lead.

Thank you for this, @_NathanCalvin. I appreciate and am a fan of the investigative work you’ve done on behalf of AI safety and believe your comments are coming from a constructive, honest place, and that it benefits the public to have people whose job is to scrutinize the actions… https://t.co/QZgPvh4tX4

In his criticism posted Monday, Calvin argues that Anthropic increasingly resembles a company racing to build superintelligence while weakening its commitments to preventing dangerous AI outcomes.

He points to the company’s more than $500 billion in computing deals, its growing use of AI to develop new models, and changes to its Responsible Scaling Policy , which establishes safeguards as models become more powerful.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.