CONNECT WITH US
Gaming

Gaming

Now That The Shoe Is On The Other Foot, Microsoft And Epic Games Suddenly Agree That AI Is Theft

Kotaku logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Now That The Shoe Is On The Other Foot, Microsoft And Epic Games Suddenly Agree That AI Is Theft

The past four weeks have been something of a wake-up call for the video game industry. You’ve read the headlines, so you know the deal by now: AI advancements spearheaded by Claude Opus 5.5 have turned the world of coding on its axis. Decompilations that used to take months, or even years, are now being pumped out on a daily basis, and publishers can’t keep up with the deluge of vibe-coded browser ports and “native” PC recompilations.

I’ve been covering and researching this over the past month, and there’s one recurring topic that keeps popping up in every comment section I read: karma. For many, this is the video game industry’s “you reap what you sow” moment, proof that the AI tools many publishers have brazenly admitted to using are a double-edged sword.

It’s a tricky subject to tackle, because it comes packaged alongside so much bias. For instance, where the PlayStation emulation scene is concerned, many see it as retribution for Sony’s decision to kill physical media. Nintendo has maintained a mostly ambivalent stance on generative AI, yet some consider the explosion in vibe-coded recomps as punishment for the company’s litigious history.

However, there’s a less ambiguous side to this discussion that I’m far more interested in tackling: hypocrisy. Many publishers are gleefully and very publicly advertising their use of AI to develop games, yet two specific publishers are attempting to have their cake and eat it too in this respect: Microsoft and Epic Games.

Hundreds of DMCA notices have been fired off by companies in response to the recent flood of AI-powered recomps.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.