CONNECT WITH US
Gaming

Gaming

Bungie Says Marathon Flopped Because It Was Too Hard

IGN logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Bungie Says Marathon Flopped Because It Was Too Hard

Bungie has admitted that extraction shooter Marathon failed at launch because it was too hard to attract a mainstream audience.

Marathon was designed as an ultra hardcore PvPvE extraction shooter where repeated death was built into the risk / reward game loop. If you die, you lose all your gear. And not just what you looted while out on the battlefield, but what you brought in. And given how easy it was to die in Marathon, particularly in PvP situations, it could feel like a brutally punishing video game.

Players certainly noticed this and made their feelings clear, even before Marathon launched. At the time, Bungie responded to concerns about its steep, unwelcoming learning curve to say that while the game was a “dangerous climb,” its difficulty could be overcome. The Sony-owned studio tried to make the point that players should play the long game, slowly improving their base stats and gaining access to better items by completing contracts and progressing faction upgrades. But unfortunately for Bungie, many players were immediately put off by the constant failure they experienced simply trying to get to grips with the game. The release of brutally difficult and complex endgame raid, Cryo Archive, in April only doubled down on the sense that Marathon was built for only the most hardcore of shooter fans.

Even former professional Counter-Strike player, Shroud, expressed concern about Marathon’s difficulty, saying that while Cryo Archive offered an incredible experience, it was too hard for casual players. "Cryo Archive is insane,” he said in April.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.