CONNECT WITH US
Fintech

Fintech

Why B2B Checks Still Move $15 Trillion a Year

PYMNTS – Fintech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Why B2B Checks Still Move $15 Trillion a Year

Despite ACH’s dominance, $15 trillion in B2B payments still moves by check, often reflecting complex approvals, disputed invoices and supplier-specific requirements.

Faster rails can’t fix fragmented invoice data, missing remittance information or unresolved commercial disputes. The next opportunity lies in automating those workflows.

The real payoff isn’t converting more transactions to ACH, but reducing reconciliation costs, improving working capital visibility and gaining control over high-value payments.

The check was supposed to be dead by now. Instead, it has become a $15 trillion reminder that moving money and settling a business obligation are not always the same thing.

Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

According to research briefs from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland published in September, ACH accounted for 41% of business-to-business payments by number in 2024, compared with just 13% for checks. Yet businesses still made approximately $15 trillion in check payments by value, and nearly 90% continued using checks for at least some transactions in 2025.

A company can automate thousands of routine supplier payments, migrate recurring invoices to ACH and eliminate much of its manual accounts payable workload without getting meaningfully closer to eliminating checks. That’s because the payments that remain are frequently those involving disputed invoices, unusual approval requirements, incomplete supplier information or commercial relationships that don’t fit neatly into standardized workflows.

7 billion, per the Fed’s research. 4 trillion to $15 trillion.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.