CONNECT WITH US
Fintech

Fintech

The $120 Billion Mirage: Penny Combos Inflated Prediction Market Volumes in Q3

Finance Magnates — Fintech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
The $120 Billion Mirage: Penny Combos Inflated Prediction Market Volumes in Q3

Prediction markets celebrated a record $179.6 billion in trading volume in the third quarter. Still, a look beneath the headline figures reveals that actual capital deployed was less than a third of that total.

According to the data from Prediction Frontier, traders paid just $56.1 billion for those contracts, with the massive $123 billion gap driven by how venues count low-cost multi-leg "combos."

The report, covering Kalshi, Polymarket’s international and US venues, and Novig, reflects the gap, created by the counting specifics: cheaper combinations of outcomes generate substantial payout-based volume from comparatively small purchases.

The report counts each traded contract at its $1 payout value, a convention Kalshi also uses in its reporting. Its alternative measure, “dollars paid”, multiplies the number of contracts by their execution price.

Buying 100 contracts for three cents each therefore produces $100 in nominal volume and $3 in purchase payments.

Combos widen the difference by combining several outcomes in one position. Under Kalshi’s rules, a combo pays $1 when every component settles at $1; any component settling at zero makes the whole contract worthless.

Low-priced combinations consequently generate more nominal volume per dollar spent on prediction markets.

Neither volume measure represents fresh deposits: contracts can trade repeatedly, and traders can reuse funds.

Kalshi combos accounted for $67.1 billion of quarterly nominal volume, which is more than a third of the four-venue total. On Kalshi, the average purchase payment per $1 contract fell from 32 cents in July to 24 cents in September.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.