The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act’s failure to advance in the Senate has shifted the next phase of U.S. crypto regulation to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), opening prospects for more trading and investment to move onchain while leaving a central question unresolved: how much certainty can regulators deliver without Congress?

Interviews with senior executives and legal experts suggest broad agreement that regulation will keep moving. Their expectations diverge over whether agency action can become a durable foundation or leave businesses adapting to rules vulnerable to political and legal change.

Lev Breydo, an assistant professor of law at William & Mary Law School, said Clarity exposed divisions within the industry, from ethics provisions to the yield fight with community banks.

“A coalition that looked unified against Gensler found out definitions create winners and losers,” he said.

Despite the setback, agencies are moving quickly to fill the regulatory gap.

The SEC’s five-year “Innovation Exemption” introduced September 17 lets qualifying venues trade tokenized U.S. stocks through blockchain liquidity pools while it works on permanent rules.

The CFTC followed on October 5, seeking feedback on rules for leveraged retail crypto trading and a new registration category for crypto markets. That starts a lengthy public comment and rulemaking process, rather than putting rules into effect.

Meanwhile, the SEC’s October 1 custody proposal would let state trust companies safeguard client crypto and allow advisers and funds to hold it themselves under certain conditions.

Looking into 2027, Breydo said he expects the SEC to focus on completing offering and custody rules and building on its tokenized-stock exemption.

Source link