CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

World Timekeepers Decide to Kill the Leap Second

CNET - Tech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
World Timekeepers Decide to Kill the Leap Second

Doing away with the leap second might prevent time-related computer anomalies in the future.

Human timekeeping rests on two main clocks, and they don’t always run at the same speed. For decades, the solution was the leap second, a minor adjustment added to international time to keep atomic accuracy aligned with the Earth’s natural motion. But on Thursday, the General Conference on Weights and Measures, or the CGPM (abbreviated from its French name), voted to abolish the leap second, closing a long-standing chapter in global time sync.

Most modern clocks rely on Coordinated Universal Time, a hybrid system caught between atomic time, which flows at a near-perfectly constant rate, and astronomical time, which fluctuates as the Earth’s rotation speeds up and slows down. To bridge the gap, UTC periodically inserted a leap second to keep pace with the planet. But reconciling physical planetary shifts with precise digital systems ultimately created more technical disruptions than it solved.

Computers are sensitive when it comes to timekeeping. The last few times we added a leap second to UTC — in 2012, 2015 and 2016 – some computer systems couldn’t handle it. Of the three instances, 2012 was the worst, as adding a leap second caused issues that crashed websites and software platforms, such as Reddit, LinkedIn and Mozilla.

The speed of Earth’s rotation experiences small changes all the time. While we can’t predict exactly how fast Earth will rotate in the future, the conference wrote that there’s a 30% chance we’ll have to add a negative leap second by 2035 to keep UTC aligned with rotational time.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.