CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

Why diagnostic delays cost more than time

Fast Company logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Why diagnostic delays cost more than time

The cost of delayed diagnosis in rare disease is often measured in years. It should also be measured in dollars, clinical capacity, and missed opportunities for better care.

Rare disease affects 1 in 10 Americans, and on average, the diagnostic odyssey for a patient with rare disease costs over $220,000 in avoidable medical fees and lost income. It’s significant time and money that patients and families can’t afford to lose. And it doesn’t end there.

The downstream economic impacts are also costly. Every prolonged diagnosis can trigger a cascade of additional appointments, referrals, and procedures that consume resources. Rounds of tests, specialist bottlenecks, and administrative burden intensify the longer a patient goes without a diagnosis. This reduces clinical capacity and extends wait times for patient care.

Currently, patients often navigate years of uncertainty before accessing information that could meaningfully change their care. That model is increasingly difficult to justify.

This is why a genome-first healthcare system is so compelling. A genome-first approach, where whole genome sequencing (WGS) is used as a first-line test and not a last resort, is helping redefine personalized care for patients with rare diseases. For me, this is where the field is headed. Starting with the genome gives us a more complete view from the outset. When combined with other data, it may bring us closer to answers that many families have been waiting too long to receive. It’s about using technology with purpose to move care forward for patients seeking answers.

Here’s an example of how costs may be lowered with whole genome sequencing.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.