CONNECT WITH US
Tech

Tech

IBM’s 100-qubit chip advances self-correcting quantum computers with 5,000 operations

Interesting Engineering – Innovation logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
IBM’s 100-qubit chip advances self-correcting quantum computers with 5,000 operations

Researchers have demonstrated how a quantum computer can repeatedly measure and reset its qubits while calculations continue, helping tame chaotic behavior inside the processor. The experiment used up to 100 qubits and demonstrated a key technique for developing more reliable quantum machines.

The team included scientists from Rutgers University, IBM, and several collaborating institutions. Their findings, published in Nature Physics, also revealed a sharp transition between chaotic and controlled quantum behavior.

Quantum computers process information differently from conventional machines. Their qubits can occupy superpositions of states, giving them capabilities that classical bits cannot directly replicate. However, these fragile states can deteriorate through interactions with the environment and imperfections in hardware.

Errors can accumulate during calculations, eventually making results unreliable. Researchers must develop systems that detect and correct these errors while computations continue. This approach, known as quantum error correction, forms the foundation of fault-tolerant quantum computing.

The team tested its approach using an IBM Quantum Heron processor with 156 qubits. Researchers selected a connected chain containing up to 100 qubits for the experiment.

They alternated between two competing processes. One scrambled information across neighboring qubits, spreading disorder through the system. The other repeatedly measured individual qubits and reset them toward a predetermined state.

The experiment involved nearly 5,000 two-qubit operations alongside almost 5,000 measurement-and-reset cycles. This allowed researchers to investigate how repeated interventions could counteract the scrambling process.

The researchers adjusted how frequently each process occurred to determine which behavior dominated. When scrambling happened more frequently, the system remained chaotic.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.