WTF?! The idea of an entire business being run by an AI agent sounds like a nightmare, but it's a scenario that Delaware is pushing for. Now, the state's plan is facing pushback from a senior lawmaker who says having an AI in charge could protect owners and investors from liability for harmful actions.

House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer wrote to Governor Matt Meyer on October 26, requesting documents about the proposed Artificial Intelligence Company, or AIC.

The Kentucky Republican wants details of safety assessments and industry involvement, warning that the investigation could lead to federal legislation restricting state AI initiatives.

Under the draft bill, Delaware would establish a 30-month regulatory sandbox to test the concept. An AIC could pursue any lawful purpose except banking, with an AI agent handling business decisions without routine human supervision. The company itself could sue and be sued.

Each AIC would have one member, either a person or an entity, responsible for keeping it adequately funded. That member would generally be protected from the company's liabilities. However, the draft includes exceptions for fraud, willful lawbreaking, and allowing activities the member knew, or should have known, fell outside the company's stated purpose.

The proposal would not make every AI-related disaster somebody else's problem. But critics question whether those exceptions offer enough protection when software makes the decisions and humans collect the profits.

UC Berkeley law professor Andrew Baker told the Financial Times that the proposed liability shield appeared excessively generous and lacked a sufficiently developed justification.

Source link