Two German courts now treat AI answers as the platform’s own speech. Entity conflation is how true facts become a false answer about you.
A German court has held Google responsible for an AI answer assembled from true facts because those facts belonged to a different man.
In a decision dated Sept. 24, 2026, the Regional Court of Aachen ordered Google to stop spreading three versions of an AI Mode answer about a local doctor. He had served as chief physician and professor of neuroradiology until late June. When people searched for why he left, AI Mode supplied a serious criminal allegation, and when they followed up with terms like suspension, termination, and court proceedings, it produced multi-paragraph accounts of a legal aftermath. The proceedings were real. They involved a different man, also a former university professor, and the court could confirm the mix-up from its own records.
The doctor sent Google a detailed explanation in late August. In mid-September, Google said it would take no action, and a formal legal demand sent the same day went nowhere. The court then acted on an emergency basis without first hearing from Google, with fines of up to 250,000 euros per violation. Google can still challenge the order.
The outcome matters less than the reasoning. The court in Aachen relied on an earlier ruling from the Regional Court of Munich, which in May held Google directly liable for AI Overviews that tied two publishers to fraud and subscription traps using claims that appeared in none of the linked sources.
Source link







