CONNECT WITH US
HealthTech

HealthTech

CMS postpones RPM payment halt for 2 years

Healthcare Dive logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
CMS postpones RPM payment halt for 2 years

The agency is delaying the end of Medicare payments for third-party remote patient monitoring services until 2029 following outcry from the virtual care industry.

The CMS sent shockwaves through the virtual care industry in July when it announced plans to end payment for RPM services provided by third-party vendors. In many cases, healthcare providers contract with companies for RPM services, where care teams remotely monitor vital signs and other health metrics and step in when patients fall outside established ranges, indicating changes to their condition. This ability to intervene quickly has been credited with improving outcomes, reducing hospitalizations and readmissions and supporting chronic disease management.

But according to the CMS, third-party contracting has led to fraud and improper billing for services. The agency cited reports from HHS' Office of Inspector General to back up its claims, stating that outsourcing RPM services can result in situations where the healthcare provider billing for the RPM service may not be involved in, or have enough oversight of, the care delivered by the third party.

So, in the proposed 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, CMS said that Medicare would only pay for RPM services provided by clinical staff employed by the practice where the patient is receiving care. This means that healthcare organizations cannot bill for third-party RPM services, in which contracted companies provide and set up the necessary technology and employ the care teams that monitor patients' health metrics.

The proposal was meant to take effect at the beginning of 2027, but in the final rule, CMS deferred the start date to the beginning of 2029.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.