CONNECT WITH US
Gaming

Gaming

Reddit Moderator Has to Pay Nintendo $4.5M After Lawsuit

Polygon logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Reddit Moderator Has to Pay Nintendo $4.5M After Lawsuit

Nearly a year after Nintendo filed a motion against a Reddit moderator who oversaw a Switch piracy forum, a verdict has been returned in the lawsuit. The proceedings did not go in the defendant's favor — which is unsurprising, given that the Reddit moderator didn't even bother showing up to court.

Aftermath reports that Nintendo was officially awarded $4.5 million in damages after accusing Redditor James "Archbox" Williams of copying, distributing, and promoting Nintendo Switch piracy to the public. Nintendo further alleged that Williams created, operated, supported, and promoted piracy websites that allowed users to download extensive libraries of Nintendo Switch games. Back in October 2025, when the motion was initially filed, Nintendo argued that the damages it was seeing were "nowhere near an amount that would compensate NOA for the seriousness of the Defendant's conduct." According to the House of Mario, it could have easily sought "several million dollars" in statutory damages for DMCA violations. Since Nintendo did not seek those damages, the company characterized its actions against Williams as "reasonable."

Prior to the release of the Switch 2, Nintendo faced a major piracy problem with its 2017 portable. Nearly every major release on the platform, from The Legend of Zelda to Pokémon, was available to download well ahead of their intended release dates. Nintendo met this threat aggressively over the years with an increasing number of lawsuits. The company has gone after piracy websites , hardware hackers , pirate software sellers , and fans who livestream pirated games .


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.