CONNECT WITH US
Fintech

Fintech

Visa Finds AI Models Fail 43% of Shopping Test Runs

PYMNTS – Fintech logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Visa Finds AI Models Fail 43% of Shopping Test Runs

Visa found that when 22 artificial intelligence models from 12 labs were put through realistic shopping scenarios, 57.2% of the test runs passed and 42.8% failed, according to a Thursday (Nov. 5) press release.

Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

Among the best-performing AI models, 82.2% of test runs passed, while among the worst-performing models, 28.9% of test runs passed, the release said.

These are some of the findings of Visa’s new industry benchmark for AI shopping, Visa Agentic Commerce Benchmark, which is designed to create a roadmap for industry players to deliver better agentic shopping experiences. The test can also be used by consumers, the release said.

Visa Agentic Commerce Benchmark tests AI models’ ability to identify the needs of a consumer based on a conversation, uncover enough information to justify its decision to buy, and opt not to buy if nothing meets the customer’s requirements, per the release.

For its first round of tests, Visa put the AI models through shopping challenges that included buying a TV, a laptop or a personal care appliance, according to the release.

Visa found that the five models with the highest average cost per run passed 67.1% of test runs, while the five least expensive models passed 50.2% of runs, the release said.

The testing also found that 54% of failed runs still ended in the AI making a purchase, even though that purchase did not meet the customer’s identified requirements, or the AI did not uncover all the customer’s requirements, per the release.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.