Stablecoins have a demand problem, not a supply problem. Infrastructure, regulation and institutional investment are racing ahead of actual corporate adoption because most CFOs still need a compelling reason to switch rails.

Payments beat holding. Enterprises increasingly look at stablecoins as faster payment infrastructure, particularly cross-border, rather than an asset to keep on the balance sheet.

CFOs don’t need a crypto thesis. They need ROI. Adoption hinges on counterparties, seamless ERP and treasury integration, and demonstrable savings across FX, fees, working capital and reconciliation.

Stablecoins have spent the past year and a half acquiring nearly everything an emerging payments technology is supposed to need to go mainstream. Clearer regulation, check; more institutional backing, check; better infrastructure and growing support from banks, FinTechs and payment providers? Check, check, and check.

Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

The problem? New research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, along with existing research from PYMNTS Intelligence, shows that what stablecoins have not been acquiring at the same pace as their infrastructure building is actual corporate demand. The most cited corporate adoption obstacles, per the Fed’s research, were not linked to regulatory uncertainty or lack of access. Companies instead were satisfied with existing payment methods, unsure of the economic benefit of stablecoins and, critically, were not being asked by customers or suppliers to transact differently.

The findings rhyme with months of PYMNTS Intelligence research, which found this spring that 42% of middle market companies had at least discussed, tested or used stablecoins, while just 13% were actually using them .

Source link