There have been times where I’ve felt the Culture War over battery electric vehicles has ended, and then you see new (or more commonly these days, recycled) mis- or disinformation popping up again.
I can forgive the accidental mis-information of people who leap into an EV and discover they needed to do some homework/prep for the change first.
This happened recently when an ABC reporter tried to use a DC charger without pre-loading and testing the App before their first-ever DC charge, as well as waiting for a 100% charge there rather than move on after the fastest charging has happened by 80%.
They blamed the EV for not working like a petrol car, rather than adapting their habits to take advantage of the freedom to refuel without standing around waiting. The Driven reported on it here: “Petrol tank mentality:” ABC’s 7.30 report on EV charging problems rated a fail
It is, however, the fact-free, deliberate dis-information type article that I feel the need to call out, especially when it comes from what the public generally treat as a ‘trusted’ source – such as dedicated car site Drive.
In an article titled “The wrong Australians are buying EVs”, a series of EV cliches were rolled out as facts, long after they have been debunked in writing, You-Tube videos and lived experience by the ever-growing number of BEV buyers.
Sigh. Where did the author come up with the idea that EVs have such limited ranges that … “ they only make sense when used in urban environments and inner-city conditions “?
Source link







