CONNECT WITH US
AI & Deeptech

AI & Deeptech

Tokenomics at scale: Track and cap Amazon Bedrock spend per IAM principal with CUR 2.0 and AWS Budgets

AWS Machine Learning logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Tokenomics at scale: Track and cap Amazon Bedrock spend per IAM principal with CUR 2.0 and AWS Budgets

Generative AI spend is hard to attribute. Before an organization expands AI access, CFOs and CTOs usually want three answers: what do we spend per person or per team, can we cap it, and how much work does it take to get there.

In our previous post, Tokenomics at Scale: How Jamf Built Real-Time Spend Enforcement for Amazon Bedrock, we explained a custom enforcement loop built on AWS IAM Identity Center, Amazon Athena over Amazon Bedrock model invocation logs, and AWS Lambda. This approach gives near-real-time control, but it requires code you then own and operate.

This post shows how to get per-identity Amazon Bedrock cost visibility and enforceable spend limits using only AWS-native features, with no application code to write for the common case. The approach relies on three things: IAM principal attribution, which Amazon Bedrock records automatically; AWS Cost and Usage Reports (CUR) 2.0 or AWS Cost Explorer for reporting; and AWS Budgets with budget actions for enforcement. By the end, you will have per-identity cost reporting and an automatic guardrail that restricts Amazon Bedrock access when a threshold is crossed.

Attribute. Amazon Bedrock captures the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) principal identity, the IAM user or role , for every inference request. This happens automatically, with no change to your Amazon Bedrock model inference calls. If several people share one role, you add per-user detail with session tags passed at role assumption time. If each person or application has its own role, principal tags on the role are enough.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.