CONNECT WITH US
Social Media

Social Media

Trump administration illegally retaliated against Anthropic, judge rules

BBC News – Social Media logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
Trump administration illegally retaliated against Anthropic, judge rules

A judge has ruled the US Department of Defense acted unlawfully when it designated artificial intelligence (AI) startup Anthropic a supply chain risk, calling the move "illegal and baseless".

The Claude-maker argued in the lawsuit that Defense Secretary Pete Hegeth overstepped his authority with the new designation. It followed Anthropic's refusal to allow the military to use its AI models for things that included surveillance or autonomous weapons.

US district judge Rita Lin said in the ruling that citing national security "is not a blank check to punish and retaliate against government critics".

The BBC has contacted the Pentagon, White House and Anthropic for comment.

Anthropic's lawsuit called the government's actions both "unprecedented and unlawful". The designation calling them a supply-chain risk cited a law aimed at protecting military systems from foreign sabotage.

It marked the first time an American company had been publicly designated as such.

The Claude-maker said its models were not reliable enough to be safely used in weapons systems for the military. It added that it opposed its use for domestic surveillance as a violation of rights.

The Pentagon said at the time that private companies should not be able to constrain military action.

The White House had previously said Anthropic was "a radical left, woke company" attempting to control military activity" and argued the military was beholden to the US Constitution, "not any woke AI company's terms of service".

Anthropic's executives estimated that the move could cost the company billions of dollars in lost business and reputational harm.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.