CONNECT WITH US
Gaming

Gaming

James Pond Co-Creator Calls AI-Rife Remake Disrespectful And Soulless

Kotaku logo

Published on

Add as a preferred source on Google
James Pond Co-Creator Calls AI-Rife Remake Disrespectful And Soulless

Last week, System 3 was under fire regarding the upcoming James Pond Legacy: The Pond Is Not Enough collection. Having released a trailer edited like meemaw’s 94th birthday e-card and rife with AI generated art, the publisher snapped back at critics by claiming that AI wasn’t even involved in development. It was a baffling statement to anyone with eyes to see, including series co-creator Chris Sorrell, who had some choice words about the remake.

“I’m sure it won’t shock you to hear that I was in no way consulted or involved,” Sorrel tells Time Extension‘s Damien McFerran. “For that to have happened there would have to have been someone with at least a scrap of respect for James Pond involved, when clearly, as their every action demonstrates, that’s very far from the case.”

Originally released on the Amiga in 1990, James Pond spawned a handful of sequels and spin-offs, the most popular among them RoboCod, ported to practically every console of the era. Like most loopy Amiga platformers, the game served as a foundation to a far more storied career, as Sorrell would proceed to work on bigger hits like MediEvil and Prototype.

As publishers stumble around the mounting backlash to AI use , the response from System 3 Software was especially surreal. Not defending their use of AI, but outright denying it, when the finished product appears to be more AI generated than not. The publisher released production art in an attempt to sway commenters, but no one was biting this worm.


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We TheMorningPulse.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It's possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.